RFA No.638/2000 Page 1 of 11

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No.638/2000

%

28^th January, 2011

SMT KAMLA DEVI & ORS

...... Appellants

Through:

Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate

VERSUS

SMT LAXMI DEVE & ORS.

...... Respondents

Through:

Mr. S.K.Rungta, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.

The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal under

Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is to the impugned

judgment and decree dated 29^th September, 2000 of the Trial Court,

whereby, the suit of the respondents/plaintiff was decreed for

possession of a plot of land admeasuring 1000 sq. yds approximately

situated in village Lampur, Delhi.

2.

The common case of the parties is that late Sh. Pat Ram

owned various properties being agricultural land and the subject Lal

Dora plot situated in village Lampur. Sh. Pat Ram had three sons

2