SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
STATE – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. ASHRAF – Respondent


CRL. LP No. 9/2008

Page 1 of 6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

DECIDED ON: OCTOBER 31, 2011

+

CRL. L.P. No. 9/2008 and Crl. M.A 818/2008

STATE

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State

versus

MOHD. ASHRAF

..... Respondent

Through: None

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers

YES

may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

YES

3. Whether the judgment should be

YES

reported in the Digest?

MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI (OPEN COURT)

%

1. By virtue of this petition, the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment

dated 17th August, 2007 of learned Additional Sessions Judge by which respondent

Mohd. Ashraf was acquitted of the charge of having committed an offence punishable

under Section 376/506 IPC. The facts of the case are that on 26th March, 2005 at about

9.28 p.m. vide DD No. 49-B, P.S. Samai Pur, Badli was informed about the complaint

being received from Shabnam that her husband was doing „galat kaam‟ with her

daughter. The DD was marked to ASI Prem Singh for necessary action. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top