RFA No.467/02

Page 1

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No. 467/2002

%

November 03, 2011

SH. RAMESH KUMAR NASA

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Alok Chhabra, Advocate with Mr. S.S.

Paul, Advocate.

VERSUS

SH. SUDHIR KUMAR RAWAL

..... Respondent

Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.

No one appeared for the respondent on 31.10.2011 when the

counsel for the appellant, as a courtesy, stated that he will inform the

respondent and his counsel. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed on

record a letter dated 31.10.2011 which was sent by courier both to the

respondent as also his Advocate. No one appears for the respondent

although it is 12.45 P.M. I have therefore heard the counsel for the appellant

and am proceeding to dispose of the appeal after perusing the record.

2.

The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit

2011:DHC:5574

RFA No.467/02

Page 2

against the appell