Page 1 of 8

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

EX.S.A. No. 1/2008

%

22^nd November, 2011

VIRENDER VASHISHT & ANR.

..... Appellants

Through : Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate.

versus

SHAM LAL DECD. & ORS.

..... Respondents

Through : None.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. This Execution Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of

Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the First Appellate

Court dated 4.10.2007. The First Appellate Court by the impugned

judgment dismissed the appeal of the objectors/appellants against the order

of the executing Court dated 23.7.2005 by which the objections of the

appellants/objectors to the execution of the judgment and decree dated

13.10.1993 were dismissed. The present litigation shows as to how the

process of the Courts is abused by certain litigants, such as the appellants.

The object of the objections is to frustrat