SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
LAVESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Bail Appl. Nos.1601 & 1602/2011 Page 1 of 7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

BAIL APPL. NO.1601/2011

BAIL APPL. NO.1602/2011

Date of Decision : 05.12.2011

BAIL APPL. NO.1601/2011

SANGITA

…… Petitioner

Through: Mr.N.Hariharan, Adv.

Versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

…… Respondent

Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP

AND

BAIL APPL. NO.1602/2011

LAVESH

…… Petitioner

Through: Mr. N.Hariharan, Adv.

Versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

…… Respondent

Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

V.K. SHALI, J. (Oral)

1.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

have gone through the record.

2011:DHC:6229

Bail Appl. Nos.1601 & 1602/2011 Page 2 of 7

2.

The contention of Mr. Hariharan, the learned counsel for

the petitioner is that Sangita and Lavesh are the real

sister and brother of the husband of the deceased. It

has been contended by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that if one reads the complaint lodged by Smt.

Veena, W/o Hira Lal, R/o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top