SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
R K JAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR – Respondent


W.P.(C) 6756/2010

Page 1 of 7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment reserved on: 29.11.2011

%

Judgment delivered on: 08.12.2011

+

W.P.(C) 6756/2010

R K JAIN

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR

..... Respondents

Through:

Ms. Geeta Sharma, Ms. Mithu Jain &

Ms. Manisha Dhir, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

J U D G M E N T

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

1.

The petitioner assails the order dated 22.04.2010 passed by the

Central Information Commissioner (CIC) upholding the order of the First

Appellate Authority, and rejecting the petitioners application under the

Right to Information Act,2005 (RTI Act, for short) by relying upon

Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.

2.

It is the petitioner’s case that upon complaints of corruption

against Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, Member, CESTAT, the President of the

CESTAT - a former Chief Justice of a High Court, made some adverse

entries in the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of Ms. Jyoti

Balasundaram for the year 2000-01. The petitioner also alleges that

subsequently, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue opened a

file with the subject

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top