SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHATTAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH & OTHERS – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 07.01.2011

+

CRL.A. 443/2010

CHATTAR SINGH

..... Appellant

versus

SUBHASH & OTHERS

..... Respondents

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellant

: Mr Saurabh Kirpal with Mr B.B. Bhatia, Mr Navjot Kumar and

Ms Rashmi Sharma

For the Respondents

: Mr K.B. Andley, Sr Advocate with Mr Mohd. Shamikh

for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

Ms Richa Kapur for the Respondent No.5/State.

CORAM:-

HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED

HONBLE MR JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to

see the judgment ?

Yes

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest ?

Yes

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

1.

Mr Chattar Singh has filed this appeal under the proviso to

section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as

‗the Code‘), claiming himself to be a ―victim‖. The appeal is directed

against the judgment dated 06.01.2010 delivered by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, North East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the

respondent nos. 1 to 4 who had been charged under sections 120-B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top