CS(OS)No.833/2009

Page 1 of 8

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment Pronounced on: 17.02.2011

+

CS(OS) No. 833/2009

M/S G4S SECURITY SERVICES (INDIA) PVT LTD

..…Plaintiff

- versus -

GROUP-4

SECURICOR

EMPLOYEES

WELFARE

ASSOCIATION & ORS

.....Defendant

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Plaintiff: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Eklavya Bahl and

Mr. Ajay Shekhar

For the Defendant: None.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN

1.Whether Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

No

2.To be referred to the Reporter or not?

No

3.Whether the judgment should be reported

in Digest?

No

V.K. JAIN, J. (ORAL)

1.

This

is

a

suit

for

permanent

injunction.

Defendants No. 1 to 3 are three separate unions of the

employees of the plaintiff, which is engaged in the business

of providing security services. It is alleged in the plaint that

some employees, in connivance with the unions, started

stopping the ingress and egress of the other employees and

2011:DHC:975

CS(OS)No.833/2009

Page 2 of 8

threatening to demonstrate in front of the offices/residences

of the management. The plaintiff company was, therefore,

constrained to file CS(OS) No. 1746/2006 wherein an

interim injunction was granted restraining the defendants

from picketing within 100 meters from the gates of the

offices and residences of officers of the plaintiff company

and they were further restrained from blocking the ingress

and egress of the staff and workers of the plaintiff company.

That suit is still pending in this Court. It is further alleged

that since new unions came up and they refused to abide by

the aforesaid order, the plaintiff company had to file another

suit being CS(OS) No. 1555/2007 against them. That suit

has been decreed by this Court restraining the defendants

from holding any demonstration, etc. within 100 meters

from the gates of the offices of the plaintiff company and the

residences of its officers as also from holding any

demonstration at Jantar Mantar in the uniform provided to

them by the plaintiff company. Similar interim relief was

granted to the plaintiff company in CS(OS) No. 355/2009.

2.

It is also alleged that the defendants, which are not

recognized by the plaintiff company, have now started

interfering in the affairs of the plaintiff company and raising

2011:DHC:975

CS(OS)No.833/2009

Page 3 of 8

illegal demands including illegal out of turn promotion for

its members. They gave a demand notice, which the plaintiff

company received on 4^th May 2009, raising some illegal

demands. A letter dated 4^th May 2009 was issued by

defendant No.1 to the Regional President of the plaintiff

company, threatening to hold demonstration and dharna at

the residence on 11^th May 2009. It is further alleged that

the defendants and their office bearers and members have

also threatened to hold mammoth gathering coupled with

procession, dharna and demonstration in front of the

regional office of the plaintiff company. They have also

threatened to completely stop the work of the plaintiff

company. The plaintiff has accordingly sought permanent

injunction restraining the defendants, their office bearers,

workers, etc. from shouting slogans, holding dharna,

demonstration, etc. within a radius of 100 meters from the

gates/boundary wall of the plaintiff company at the

registered office at 16, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak

Puri, New Delhi-110058, its corporate office at Panchwati,

82A, Sector 18, Gurgaon (Haryana) and the residence of its

Regional President at Green Farm No.1, Rajokri, Near

Rajokri Red Light, New Delhi.

2011:DHC:975

CS(OS)No.833/2009

Page 4 of 8

3.

Defendants No.1 and 3 were proceeded ex parte.

Defendant