SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ABB LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANDEEP SURI AND ORS. – Respondent


RFA No.74/2004 Page 1 of 4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No. 74/2004

%

16th February, 2012

ABB LTD.

..... Appellant

Through :

Mr. Nikhilesh Krishna, Advocate.

versus

SANDEEP SURI AND ORS.

..... Respondents

Through :

Mr. Sunil Magon, Advocate for R-1.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)

1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed

under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the

impugned judgment of the trial Court dated 3.11.2003 by which the suit of

the respondent/plaintiff for declaration and injunction for ownership with

respect to 600 shares of the appellant-company was decreed. I may note

that out of the total of 600 original shares which were in dispute, presently,

the disputes only remains for 50 shares, inasmuch as, 500 shares were

transferred to the respondent No.1/plaintiff during the pendency of this

appeal and another 50 shares were trans

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top