SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VISHNU SECURITY SERVICES – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ANR. – Respondent


LPA No.960/2011

Page 1 of 20

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

LPA No. 960 OF 2011

VISHNU SECURITY SERVICES

. . . APPELLANT

Through :

Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate

VERSUS

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND

COMMISSIONER AND ANR.

… RESPONDENTS

Through:

Mr. Keshav Mohan, Advocates.

CORAM :-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE:

1.

By one paragraph order, the learned Single Judge on 30th September,

2011, dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant herein observing that

this Court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition in view of

five-Judges Bench judgment dated 1st August, 2011 rendered by this Court in

WP(C) No. 6570/2010 entitled Sterling Agro Industries Ltd. v. Union of

India. The learned Single Judge has opined that merely because Employees

Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate

Tribunal) is located in Delhi, it had decided the appeal and that was the

subject matter of challenge in the writ petition, would not be a ground to

2012:DHC:1169-DB

LPA No.960/2011

Page 2 of 20

entertain th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top