DELHI HIGH COURT
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP (C) No.6791/2008 & WP(Crl.) No.244/2010
Page 1 of 22
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
WP (C) No.6791/2008 & WP(Crl.) No.244/2010
Date of Hearing: 09.12.2011
%
Date of Decision: 28.02.2012
1) WP(C) No.6791/2008
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Maninder Singh,
Senior Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj
Nair and Mr. Divyam Agarwal
Versus
UNION OF INDIA
…..Respondent
Through Mr.Ravinder Agarwal
2) WP (Crl.) No.244/2010
B.C. SHARMA & ANOTHER
…..Petitioner
Through: Sudhir Chandra,
Senior Advocate with
Mr. Rajesh Batra
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
…..Respondent
Through Mr. B.V. Niren for
respondent No.1
Mr. M.Y. Khan for respondent
No.4
CORAM :-
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
2012:DHC:1415-DB
WP (C) No.6791/2008 & WP(Crl.) No.244/2010
Page 2 of 22
A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
1. In both these writ petitions challenge laid is to the same provision,
namely, definition of „Food‟ contained in Section 2 (v) of the Prevention
of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as „the PFA
Act‟). This Section reads as under:-
“(v)“food” means any arti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.