SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
B.C. SHARMA & ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


WP (C) No.6791/2008 & WP(Crl.) No.244/2010

Page 1 of 22

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

WP (C) No.6791/2008 & WP(Crl.) No.244/2010

Date of Hearing: 09.12.2011

%

Date of Decision: 28.02.2012

1) WP(C) No.6791/2008

PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.

…..Petitioner

Through: Mr. Maninder Singh,

Senior Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj

Nair and Mr. Divyam Agarwal

Versus

UNION OF INDIA

…..Respondent

Through Mr.Ravinder Agarwal

2) WP (Crl.) No.244/2010

B.C. SHARMA & ANOTHER

…..Petitioner

Through: Sudhir Chandra,

Senior Advocate with

Mr. Rajesh Batra

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

…..Respondent

Through Mr. B.V. Niren for

respondent No.1

Mr. M.Y. Khan for respondent

No.4

CORAM :-

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

2012:DHC:1417-DB

WP (C) No.6791/2008 & WP(Crl.) No.244/2010

Page 2 of 22

A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

1. In both these writ petitions challenge laid is to the same provision,

namely, definition of „Food‟ contained in Section 2 (v) of the Prevention

of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as „the PFA

Act‟). This Section reads as under:-

“(v)“food” means any arti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top