SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
A.R.BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
R.S.VERMA & OTHERS – Respondent


*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

RESERVED ON: MARCH 28 , 2012

PRONOUNCED ON: APRIL 10, 2012

+

LPA 904/2010

A.R.BANERJEE

……..Appellant

Through: Mr.Anup Banerjee with

Md.Naved, Advocates.

versus

R.S.VERMA & OTHERS

.…..Respondents

Through: Mr.Anand Nandan, Adv. for R-1.

Mr.Arun Birbal, Adv. for DDA.

Mr.Gautam Awasthi, Adv. for

Indian Bank.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

1. The appellant, A.R.Banerjee has impugned the order

dated 16.07.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in

W.P.(C) No.14090/2009 whereby six months‟ time was

granted to the appellant to obtain requisite permission for

using a part of the ground floor for banking purposes and the

basement for a coaching centre; needless to state the

permission had to be from the competent authority, which as

we were given to understand is the Municipal Corporation of

2012:DHC:2345-DB

Delhi. As per the order, on appellant‟s failure to do the

needful, the Competent Authority was given liberty to take

appropriate action as per law.

2. The directions have been issued on a writ petition filed

by the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top