SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M/s. AAR ESS AND CO. AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/s. RATHI UDYOG LTD. – Respondent


RFA No.658-59/2006 Page 1 of 12

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No. 658-59/2006

%

19th April, 2012

M/s. AAR ESS AND CO. AND ANR.

..... Appellants

Through : Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocate.

versus

M/s. RATHI UDYOG LTD.

..... Respondent

Through : Mr. Shiv Khorana, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)

1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under

Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned

judgment of the trial Court dated 20.07.2006 decreeing the suit of the

respondent/plaintiff filed under Order 37 CPC for recovery of ` 10,41,945/-.

The suit was filed for recovery of moneys on account of appellants/defendants

2012:DHC:2620

RFA No.658-59/2006 Page 2 of 12

failing to make payments of the goods namely Tor Steel Bars supplied to it by

the respondent/plai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top