SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MRS. SAVIDA SADH – Appellant
Versus
NARENDER PAL MALIK – Respondent


RFANo.515/01 Page 1 of 8

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No.515/2001

%

24th May, 2012

MRS. SAVIDA SADH

...... Appellant

Through:

Mr. T.A.Francis and Mr. Mahesh

Katyayan, Advocate.

VERSUS

NARENDER PAL MALIK

...... Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.

This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of

Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the trial Court dated

13.8.2001 dismissing the suit for specific performance and injunction filed by

the appellant/plaintiff. The suit has been dismissed although the proposed

2012:DHC:3595

RFANo.515/01 Page 2 of 8

seller/defendant no.1 failed to appear in the proceedings i.e. no written

statement was filed, the witness of the appellant/plaintiff was not cross-

examined and no evidence was led by the defendant no.1/respondent.

2.

The facts as per the plaint are that the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top