WP(C) 4371/2001 Page 1 of 3

$~R-37

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

W.P.(C) 4371/2001

SURINDER SINGH

...Petitioner

Represented by: Mr.Sarvesh Bisaria, Advocate.

versus

UOI & ORS.

..... Respondents

Represented by: Mr.Ravinder Agarwal and Mr.Amit

Yadav, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1.

O.A. No. 1257/1998 filed by the writ petitioner has been dismissed by

the Central Administrative Tribunal as per the impugned order dated March

09, 2001.

2.

The Recruitment Rule for the post of Chief Enforcement Officer has a

feeder cadre consisting of:- (i) Enforcement Officer; (ii) Office

Superintendent.

3.

The Recruitment Rule does not provide for any quota; and this would

mean that an integrated/combined seniority list of Enforcement Officers and

Office Superintendents is prepared by the Department from which eligible

candidates are considered for promotion.

4.

In the Original Application, vide para 4(c), after pleading th