SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES – Appellant
Versus
SHOBHA KANDPAL – Respondent


WP(C)No.278/2013 Page 1 of 3

$~31

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

W.P.(C) 278/2013

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ..... Petitioner

Represented by:

Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate

instructed by Mr.Sudhir Kathpalia

& Mr.Vibhor Garg, Advocates

versus

SHOBHA KANDPAL

..... Respondent

Represented by:

Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg with

Mr. Imran Ahmad & Mr.Amit

Srivastava, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (ORAL)

CM No.570/2013

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 278/2013

1.

Let us first note the admitted facts.

2.

In the year 1992, the Supreme Court had required All India Institute of

Medical Sciences to frame a one-time policy to regularize the services of

those who had worked on research projects on contract, ad-hoc or temporary

basis up to 15 years.

3.

Based thereon, All India Institute of Medical Sciences filled up posts

of Information Officer, Programmer, Research Officers, Social Workers,

Research Assistants, Senior Rese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top