HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
HUSSAIN DALAL & ORS. – Respondent
CS(OS)-1225_2013
CS(OS) No.1225/2013 Page 1 of 12
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
CS(OS) No.1225/2013
HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION & ANR ..... Plaintiffs
Through
Mr.N.K.Anand, Advocate ,
Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.Dhruv Anand
& Mr.Achuthan Sreekumar, Advs.
Versus
HUSSAIN DALAL & ORS
..... Defendants
Through
None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
MANMOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)
1.
I.A.No.9923/2013 (exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
The applications are disposed of.
2.
I.A.No.9924/2013 (U/s 149 r/w Section 151 CPC)
By this application, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs craves leave
to extend the time to make good deficient court fee. Mr. Anand submits that
the same would be deposited within two weeks as the steps have already
been taken. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the plaintiffs,
the prayer is allowed. The application is disposed of.
2013:DHC:2985
CS(OS) No.1225/2013 Page 2 of 12
3.
CS(OS) No.1225/2013
Issue summons to the defendants, on filing of process fee and Regd.
A.D. Covers within a week, returnable on 15th July, 2013 before the roster
Bench.
I.A.No.9922/2013 (u/o XXXIX, R.1 & 2 CPC)
4.
Issue notice to the defendants, returnable on 15th July, 2013.
5.
The plaintiffs have filed the instant suit for infringement of trade
mark, passing off, commercial disparagement and tarnishment of goodwill
and damages. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs have filed the interim
application seeking prayers as contained in the application.
6.
It is stated by plaintiffs that the plaintiff is a well known laboratory in
the field of ayurvedic preparations and is carrying on business for more than
100 years from now. It is stated that the plaintiffs have given several useful
products to the public at large which are not merely famous in India but
world over. The said products include the celebrated ones like ROOH
AFZA, Rogan Badaam Shrin etc.
7.
The plaintiffs state that the trade mark ROOHAFZA is one of the
most popular trade mark in respect of sharbats which gives cooling effect to
the human body. The said trade mark has been put to extensive use since the
year 1907 and the trade mark ROOHAFZA is registered since the year 1945
prior to independence of this country.
8.
The plaintiffs have stated that the usage, reach and consumption of the
product ROOHAFZA is such that the said product is a household name
across India and the globe. It is stated that no one could imagine his or her
upbringing atleast in India and neighboring countries without hearing about
the sharbat called ROOHAFZA which has a tremendous and stupendous
mass approach.
2013:DHC:2985
CS(OS) No.1225/2013 Page 3 of 12
9.
In the light of the same, it is the grievance of the plaintiffs that the
defendants have recently released the movie with the name YEH JAWAANI
HAIN DEEWANI which has hit the cinema halls and the said movie
contains some dialogues which somehow show the well known product
ROOHAFZA in the manner which is detrimental to the interests of the
plaintiffs as a proprietor. The plaintiffs in order to fortify its stand has
reproduced the offending dialogues in the film which are reproduced as
under:
a)Son: “Yeh Roohafza Bahut Bekaar Hai!”
b)Mom : “Sab Thik Ho Jayega!”
Son: “Siwaye Is Roohafza Ke…. Bahut Bura Hai”
10.
The plaintiffs contend that the said conversation between the mother
and son in the film depicts a kind of household wherein mom tries to console
his son that everything will be alright no matter what difficulties he is facing
and in response to the same, the son responds that everything can change but
this ROOHAFZA will remain t