HIGH COURT OF DELHI
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. – Respondent
FAO(OS)-214_2012
FAO(OS)-210, 214&215 of 2012 Page 1 of 37
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
FAO(OS) 210/2012
VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.
…Appellant
Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate
instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Anirudh Das,
Ms.Smarika Singh, Ms.B.S.Baby, Mr.Manu Krishnan,
Advocates.
versus
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents
Represented by: Mr.A.K.Ganguly, Sr.Advocate
instructed by Mr.Parmatma Singh, Ms.Reeta
Chaudhary, Mr.A.K.Panda, Mr.Jagmohan Sharma,
Mr.Mayank Jain, Mr.Madhur Jain, Mr.Sharat Kapoor,
Mr.Ashish Goswami, Advocates.
And
+
FAO(OS) 214/2012
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Appellants
Represented by: Mr.A.K.Ganguly, Sr.Advocate
instructed by Mr.Parmatma Singh, Ms.Reeta
Chaudhary, Mr.A.K.Panda, Mr.Jagmohan Sharma,
Mr.Mayank Jain, Mr.Madhur Jain, Mr.Sharat Kapoor,
Mr.Ashish Goswami, Advocates.
versus
VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.
…Respondent
Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate
instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Anirudh Das,
Ms.Smarika Singh, Ms.B.S.Baby, Mr.Manu Krishnan,
Advocates.
2013:DHC:2998-DB
FAO(OS)-210, 214&215 of 2012 Page 2 of 37
And
+
FAO(OS) 215/2012
AMCI PTY LTD.
…Appellant
Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate
instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Anirudh Das,
Ms.Smarika Singh, Ms.B.S.Baby, Mr.Manu Krishnan,
Advocates.
versus
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents
Represented by: Mr.A.K.Ganguly, Sr.Advocate
instructed by Mr.Parmatma Singh, Ms.Reeta
Chaudhary, Mr.A.K.Panda, Mr.Jagmohan Sharma,
Mr.Mayank Jain, Mr.Madhur Jain, Mr.Sharat Kapoor,
Mr.Ashish Goswami, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
1.
AMCI Australia Pty Ltd. (AMCI), a company incorporated
in Australia and owning coal mines entered into Agreement No.217/2007
dated April 23, 2007 with Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) for sale of
One Million Metric Ton of Hard Coking Coal as per specifications
contained in the agreement. The company was later on re-named CVRD
Australia Pty Ltd. after the CVRD Group acquired the shares of AMCI
Holding Australia Pty Ltd. and is currently known as VALE Australia Pty
Ltd. Since under the agreement, AMCI Australia Pty Ltd. was acting
both as the coal producer and the seller and as a result of name being
2013:DHC:2998-DB
FAO(OS)-210, 214&215 of 2012 Page 3 of 37
changed upon shareholding of the Holding company‟s changing VALE
Australia Pty Ltd. become the producer and AMCI Pty Ltd. the seller of
the coal.
2.
The litigation has been jointly fought by the two companies
for the reason the rights and liabilities of the two entities are joint as per
a supplementary agreement dated June 07, 2007.
3.
As per the agreement, One Million Metric Ton of coal had to
be supplied during the delivery period July 2007 to June 2008. The coal
had to be of the specification as in clause 1.1 read with Annexure-II and
II-A of the agreement. As per clause 1.2 of the agreement the shipment
had to be evenly spread during the delivery period with right in SAIL to
postpone deliveries by up to three months. As per clause 2.1 the price
fixed was US$ 96.45 per Metric Ton (free on board). The port of loading
had to be one of the Australian ports listed in clause 2.1. As per clause
2.2, by mutual consent the parties could extend the time for delivery of
the coal.
4.
As per clause 7.1 the period of delivery was expressly stated
to be of the essence of the agreement and as per clause 8.1 if supply was
not made within the agreed time SAIL had the right to seek liquidated
damages at a sum equivalent to 1% of the price of the