DELHI HIGH COURT
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK WADHWA – Respondent
LPA No.63/2012 Page 1 of 10
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment reserved on
:14.01. 2013
Judgment pronounced on:
:21.01.2013
+
LPA 63/2012 and CM No.1722/2012(stay)
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Appellant
Through :
Mr. Rajesh Mahajan with Mr.
Piyush Gaur and Mr. Arun
Bhardwaj , Adv.
versus
DEEPAK WADHWA
.... Respondent
Through :
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. for
Workman.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
V.K. JAIN, J.
1. On 14th September, 1992, the respondent was appointed as a Beldar
with the appellant on muster roll, for a period of ninety days. Vide
subsequent order dated 18th September, 1992, he was appointed in the
same capacity, again for a period of ninety days. It was stated in the
order dated 18th September, 1992 that his appointment will not confer any
right for regular appointment and will automatically come to an end on
the expiry of aforesaid period or could be terminated earlier, at any time,
2013:DHC:320-DB
LPA No.63/2012
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.