SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ARUN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE – Respondent


W.P.(C) No.5880 /2012 Page 1 of 7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) No.5880/2012 and C.M. No.12101/2012

%

26th July, 2013

ARUN

..... Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv.

versus

DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms. Avnish Ahlawat &

Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. This writ petition came up for hearing in the morning when a request

was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for adjournment to file

the rejoinder affidavit. The counter affidavit was filed way back in January,

2013 (i.e as many as six months back), and therefore, request for filing

rejoinder was declined. The request for passover was however acceded to.

On the second call, during the course of hearing I told the counsel for the

petitioner that whatever is the rejoinder with him, he may give the same to

the Court, however, this rejoinder has not been given to the Court. Counsel

2013:DHC:3647

W.P.(C) N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top