DELHI HIGH COURT
ARUN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.5880 /2012 Page 1 of 7
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(C) No.5880/2012 and C.M. No.12101/2012
%
26th July, 2013
ARUN
..... Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv.
versus
DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Avnish Ahlawat &
Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. This writ petition came up for hearing in the morning when a request
was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for adjournment to file
the rejoinder affidavit. The counter affidavit was filed way back in January,
2013 (i.e as many as six months back), and therefore, request for filing
rejoinder was declined. The request for passover was however acceded to.
On the second call, during the course of hearing I told the counsel for the
petitioner that whatever is the rejoinder with him, he may give the same to
the Court, however, this rejoinder has not been given to the Court. Counsel
2013:DHC:3647
W.P.(C) N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.