HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PIONEER INDIA ELECTRONICS (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR – Respondent
WP(C)-5120_2011
=======================================================================
WP(C) 5120/2011
Page 1 of 36
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment reserved on :
29th July, 2013
Judgment pronounced on: 13th September, 2013
+
W.P.(C) 5120/2011
PIONEER INDIA ELECTRONICS (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through
Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi,
Senior Advocate with
Mr.S.K.Dubey, Mr.Zeeshan
Khan and Ms.Anuradha
Salhotra, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through
Ms.Sonia Sharma, Adv for
Union of India.
Mr.Anshuman Chowdhury,
Advocate for R-2
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning
the Circular No.23/2010-Customs dated 29.7.2010 and
the notification No. 93/2008-Customs dated 1.8.2008.
The petitioner further prays for setting aside of the
orders dated 21.3.2011 and 27.4.2011 passed by the
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) relying on the
2013:DHC:4641
=======================================================================
WP(C) 5120/2011
Page 2 of 36
impugned
Circular
No.
23/2010-Customs
dated
29.7.2010 and further sought a writ of mandamus
seeking refund of the provisional duty paid amounting
to Rs. 94,43,216/-.
2. The petitioner M/s Pioneer India Electronics Private
Limited was incorporated in the year 2008 and is
subsidiary of Pioneer Corporation, Japan. The
petitioner is engaged in the import and marketing of
Pioneer branded products in India.
3. The petitioner imported several electrical goods falling
under the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act,
1975 (hereinafter referred to as, the Act). The goods
were cleared after payment of provisional duty.
4. As it was a case of a related party transaction,
Customs Authorities referred the case to the Special
Valuation Branch of the Customs for the purposes of
valuation and clearance. Pending valuation by the
Special Valuation Branch, all bills of Entry were
cleared by the Customs Authorities provisionally under
Section 18 of the Act. After valuation by the Special
Valuation Branch of the Customs, the liability was
determined and the importer i.e. the petitioner then
applied for finalisation of the Bill of Entry. On the
finalisation of the Bill of Entry, the final duty was
2013:DHC:4641
=======================================================================
WP(C) 5120/2011
Page 3 of 36
assessed and the provisional duty paid was adjusted
towards the final assessment. The said procedure is
followed in related party transactions. In case, any
additional duty is payable on final adjudication, the
importer is liable to pay the same and where the
provisional duty is more than the final duty assessed
the importer is entitled to the refund of the same.
5. On 14.09.2007 notification No. 102/2007-Customs was
issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India
in exercise of powers conferred by Sub-section 1 of
Section 25 of the Act. Vide the said notification, the
Central Government exempted the goods falling within
the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
when imported into India for subsequent sale from the
whole of the additional duty of Customs leviable
thereon under Sub-section 5 of Section 3 of the said
Customs Tariff Act. The exemption contained in the
notification was subject to the fulfilment of the
following conditions:
―(a) the importer of the said goods shall pay
all duties, including the said additional duty
of customs leviable thereon, as applicable,
at the time of importation of the goods;
(b) the importer, while issuing the invoice
for sale of the said goods, shall s