SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKAS DEDEECH – Appellant
Versus
RICHLOOK GARMENTS (P) LTD. – Respondent


CRP.No.33/2013

Page 1 of 10

$~40

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision : 15th February, 2013

+

C.R.P. 33/2013

VIKAS DEDEECH

..... Petitioner

Through :

Mr.Rahul Sharma and Mr.Uzma

Ashraf, Advs.

versus

RICHLOOK GARMENTS (P) LTD.

..... Respondent

Through :

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

%

PRATIBHA RANI, J. (ORAL)

CM. No.2742/2013 (Condonation of Delay in re-filing the petition)

1. In view of the reasons given in the application, the delay in re-

filing the petition is condoned.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRP No.33/2013 & CM No.2741/2013 (Stay)

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 04.10.2012 whereby

the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi dismissed the applications of the

petitioner moved under Order IX Rule 7 CPC and under Section 5 of

Limitation Act.

2013:DHC:844

CRP.No.33/2013

Page 2 of 10

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that learned Trial Court has

passed the impugned order in great haste wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top