SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH BALA & ORS – Appellant
Versus
RAMPAL – Respondent


RSA No.252/2013 Page 1 of 14

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RSA No. 252/2013

%

15th January, 2014

SURESH BALA & ORS

......Appellants

Through:

Mr. B.S.Mann, Advocate.

VERSUS

RAMPAL

...... Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. This regular second appeal impugns the judgment of the appellate

court dated 20.7.2013 by which the appellate court set aside the judgment of

the trial court dismissing the suit as being not maintainable in the civil court

in view of Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The case of

the appellants before this court, and who were the defendants in the suit, is

that Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act is a complete bar to the

maintainability of the suit. Reliance is placed on behalf of the appellants

upon a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Om

Prakash & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. LPA No.81/2012

decided on 11.9.2012.

2014:DHC:235

RSA No.252/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top