DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH BALA & ORS – Appellant
Versus
RAMPAL – Respondent
RSA No.252/2013 Page 1 of 14
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
RSA No. 252/2013
%
15th January, 2014
SURESH BALA & ORS
......Appellants
Through:
Mr. B.S.Mann, Advocate.
VERSUS
RAMPAL
...... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. This regular second appeal impugns the judgment of the appellate
court dated 20.7.2013 by which the appellate court set aside the judgment of
the trial court dismissing the suit as being not maintainable in the civil court
in view of Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The case of
the appellants before this court, and who were the defendants in the suit, is
that Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act is a complete bar to the
maintainability of the suit. Reliance is placed on behalf of the appellants
upon a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Om
Prakash & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. LPA No.81/2012
decided on 11.9.2012.
2014:DHC:235
RSA No.252/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.