SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANSHUL ARYA – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH CHHABRA AND ANR. – Respondent


$~21.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(OS) 411/2013

ANSHUL ARYA

..... Plaintiff

Through :

Mr.Virendera S. Chaudhry and

Mr.Anand Verdhan Maitrya, Advs.

versus

RAKESH CHHABRA AND ANR

..... Defendants

Through :

Mr.Alok Sinha, Adv. for defendant no.1.

Defendant no.2 in person.

Mr.Rajiv Vig, Adv. for defendant no.3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI

O R D E R

%

21.07.2014

1.

Plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration, recovery of

possession, damages for illegal occupation/mesne profits and

permanent injunction with respect to the Flat bearing no.42, 3rd floor,

Antariksha Apartment, Vikas Puri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to

as the ‘suit property’.

2.

Office is directed to place the amended plaint along with amended

memo of parties in Part 1 of the file.

3.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff prays that a decree may be passed

against defendant no.1 under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC as after service

the defendants had sought time to file the written statement,

however, no written statement has been filed by defendant no.1. It

is further submitted that right to file written statement of defendant

no.1 was closed on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top