SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SEETAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


CRL.A. Nos. 661,717,916 of 2009 & 94 of 2010

Page 1 of 13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.A. 94 of 2010

SEETAL

..... Appellant

Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP.

CRL.A. 661 of 2009

NARENDER @ LALA

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Advocate

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP.

CRL.A. 717 of 2009

VEERPAL

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma and Mr. Amit

Kala, Advocates.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP.

WITH

CRL.A. 916 of 2009

NETRAPAL @ VINOD

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate.

2014:DHC:3796

CRL.A. Nos. 661,717,916 of 2009 & 94 of 2010

Page 2 of 13

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP.

CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

O R D E R

08.08.2014

1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25th March

2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‗ASJ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top