SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
KAMLA NIJHAWAN – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL KUMAR NIJHAWAN AND ORS. – Respondent


*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

I.A. No. 2166/2014 (Order XII Rule 6 CPC) in CS (OS)

No. 3048/2011

KAMLA NIJHAWAN

..... Plaintiff

Through

Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, Advocate,

with

Ms.

Amrit

Kaur

Oberoi,

Advocate and Ms. Shubhani Jain,

Advocate.

versus

SUSHIL KUMAR NIJHAWAN AND ORS.

..... Defendants

Through

Mr. Manish Vashisht, Advocate and

Mr. Dhruv Rohtagi, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL

1.

This is an application under Order XII Rule 6 read with Section 151 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking a decree in favour of

the Plaintiff and against the Defendants on admission.

2.

A suit for possession, declaration, permanent and mandatory

injunction, mesne profits and damages has been filed by the Plaintiff

against the Defendants. Plaintiff Smt. Kamla Nijhawan is the

grandmother of Defendant no. 1 and mother of Defendant no. 2.

Defendants no. 3 and 4 are the government bodies and lessors of

property no. 13/27, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008.

2014:DHC:4372

3.

The sum and substance of the averments made in the plaint is that Late

Shri Balwant Rai Nijhawan, the deceased husband

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top