HIGH COURT OF DELHI
STATE – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN – Respondent
CRLLP-17_2014
Crl.L.P.No.17 of 2014
Page 1 of 5
$~6
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CRL.L.P. 17/2014
STATE
..... Petitioner
Represented by:
Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for
the State with Inspector
V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini.
versus
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
..... Respondent
Represented by:
Mr.B.S.Rana, Mr.Vijender
Bhardwaj and Mr.Satyam
Sisodia, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
%
09.09.2014
1. By the present petition the State seeks leave to appeal against the
impugned judgment dated August 31, 2013 whereby Ashok Kumar Jain has
been acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 307/452/506/342
IPC.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on September 11, 2008 SI Yashpal
along with Constable Satya Parkash while returning after attending a call of
DD No.42B reached at D-12/68, Sector-7, Rohini where they found a large
gathering and public persons were beating a person. Constable Moolchand
was already present there who was trying to save the said person. They
removed the public and found Rishi (later on told his name as Ashok Kumar
Jain) was being beaten.
2014:DHC:4518-DB
Crl.L.P.No.17 of 2014
Page 2 of 5
3. Rajni came forward and made a complaint that at about 12.30
somebody knocked the door of their house. When she opened the door she
found one persons who told his name as Ashok standing with a sweets box
in his hand. She tried to talk to her husband but the phone was found
disconnected. Suddenly the said Ashok stopped her, dragged her inside by
holding her hairs. He threatened her to kill. When she tried to run away he
tied her legs, hands and mouth and gave beatings by his shoes. He also
attacked her on her hand with a knife. In the meantime, she heard the noise
of knocking of the door. Her nephew Mohit came inside after breaking the
door when Ashok tried to run away from there.
4. The learned Trial Court acquitted the respondent primarily on the
grounds that there were material improvements in the testimony of Rajni;
though she alleges that she was attacked by a knife and Ashok was
apprehended on the spot however, no knife was recovered and no
independent witness from the public was joined though it is the case of the
prosecution that accused was apprehended when large public had collected.
5. Rajni deposed before the Court that on September 11, 2008 at 12.30
PM she was present at her house D-12/68, First Floor, Sector-7, Rohini,
Ashok Kumar Jain knocked the door of her house and told her that he wants
to give the box of sweets as he was blessed with a son. She asked Ashok
Kumar to deliver the same to her husband at the office but he told that he
had been sent by her husband Raj Kumar Singhal at his resident as he had
gone to Panipat. She opened the door and took the box of sweets from
Ashok Kumar Jain. When she tried to close the door he asked for a glass of
water. As soon as she went for taking the water Ashok Kumar entered the
house and after taking water he said that he wanted to use the toilet. He
2014:DHC:4518-DB
Crl.L.P.No.17 of 2014
Page 3 of 5
went inside. Rajni made a call to her husband and informed that somebody
had come to their house to give sweets box. She gave the landline phone to
Ashok Kumar Jain to talk to her husband and went to the balcony.
Thereafter Ashok Kumar Jain stated that her husband wanted to talk to her.
She told him that he should go and she will talk to her husband later on,
however, he stated that her husband had some emergency. She took the
phone but found the same disconnected. In the meanwhile, Ashok Kumar
put his one hand on her mouth from the other hand caught hold of her hair
and dragged her inside the room. She bit the hand of Ashok Kumar Jain.
When she asked him what he was doing, he stated that he had come to kill
her. Ashok had a knife with which he attacked her. She stopped the assault
wit