RCR 142/2013

Page 1 of 9

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RC. REV. No.142/2013

%

17^th September, 2014

M/S. ROXY DRYCLEANERS

......Petitioner

Through:

Mr. P.P.Ahuja, Advocate.

VERSUS

SAMEER WASON & ANR.

...... Respondents

Through:

Mr. P.K.Rawal and Mr. Harish

Kumar, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.

By this petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent

Control Act, 1958 (in short ‘the Act’), the petitioner /tenant impugns the

judgment passed by the Additional Rent Controller on 31.10.2012, by which

the Additional Rent Controller has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction

petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act by the respondents/landlords

with respect to the tenanted premises being shop no. 53(new), Old Rajinder

Nagar Market, New Delhi.

2014:DHC:4783

RCR 142/2013

Page 2 of 9

2.

The facts which were pleaded by the respondents/landlords

were that the tenanted shop/suit premises were required for the bonafide

need of the respondent no.2 herein, and who was the petitioner no.2 before

the Additional Rent Controller. The