SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SHEMAROO ENTERTAINMENT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AMIT SHARMA & ORS. – Respondent


CS (OS) No.1325/2012 Page 1 of 8

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

I.A. No. 13807/2014 in CS(OS) No.1325/2012

SHEMAROO ENTERTAINMENT LTD ..... Plaintiff

Through Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Sukant

Vikram, Mr. Yash Vardhan,

Ms. Madhavi Khare, Advs.

versus

AMIT SHARMA & ORS

....Defendants

Through Mr. Kunal Tandon, Ms. Nidhi

Jain, Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

for D-1 and D-2.

Mr. Ankur Sanghal, Adv for D-6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

MANMOHAN SINGH, J.

1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining

the defendants from using the catch words of the song “Thodi Si Jo

Pee Li Hai”(hereinafter referred to as the “suit song”) from the film

“Namak Halal”(hereinafter referred to as the “feature film”) in their

film “Department” (hereinafter referred to as the “suit film”) without

deleting the portion of the song and also from exploiting the audio

rights of the suit film containing the above portion, by way of DVD’s,

MP3, CD’s etc.

Case of the plaintiff

2. The plaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top