SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M/S TEXMACO LTD. – Appellant
Versus
CH.RAMSWAROOP WRESTLING CLUB & ORS. – Respondent


C.R.P.No.157/2014 page 1 of 4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ C.R.P.157/2014 & C.M.No.18169/2014 (Exemption)

%

07th November, 2014

M/S TEXMACO LTD.

..... Petitioner

Through

Mr.Dayanand Krishnan, Sr.Advocate

with Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate.

versus

CH.RAMSWAROOP WRESTLING CLUB & ORS. ..... Respondents

Through

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. The present petition under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure

Act, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order of the trial court dated 25.9.2014 by

which the trial court has rejected an application filed by the

petitioner/defendant no.2 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

2. The limited issue which was required to be addressed for disposal of

the said application was that the petitioner/defendant no.2 claimed that since

the respondent no.1/plaintiff was an unregistered association on the date of

filing of the suit, subsequent registration of the respondent no.1/ plaintiff as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top