HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MANU NARANG & ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE LT. GOVERNOR, GOVERNMENT NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS – Respondent
WP(C)-5975_2013
W.P.(C) No.5975/2013, 3591/2014 & 10328/2015 Page 1 of 12
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of decision: 23rd December, 2015
+
W.P.(C) No.5975/2013
MANU NARANG & ANR
..... Petitioners
Versus
THE LT. GOVERNOR, GOVERNMENT NATIONAL
CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS .... Respondents
+
W.P.(C) No.3591/2014, CM No.7330/2014 , CM No.16198/2014
(both for interim relief), CM No.6076/2015 (u/O-1 R-10 CPC) &
CM No.6094/2015 (u/S 151 CPC).
AMIT GUPTA
..... Petitioner
Versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondents
+
W.P.(C) No.10328/2015 & CM No.25753/2015 (for stay).
ATUL GUPTA
..... Petitioner
Versus
LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
OF DELHI AND ORS
..... Respondents
2015:DHC:10480-DB
W.P.(C) No.5975/2013, 3591/2014 & 10328/2015 Page 2 of 12
Counsels for the petitioners:-
Mr. Manav Gupta along with Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. in W.P.(C)
No.5975/2013.
Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, Adv. in W.P.(C) No.10328/2015.
Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa along with Mr.
Vipul Kumar, Advs. in W.P.(C) No.3951/2014.
Counsels for the respondents:-
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjoy Ghosh, ASC
Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Adv. for DDA.
Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Adv. for R-5.
Ms. Mini Pushkarna with Ms. Yoothika Pallavi, Adv. for SDMC.
Ms.Uttara Babbar with Mr. Vinod Kapoor, Advs. in CM
No.2385/2015 in W.P.(C) No.3591/2014
Mr. Anshuman Sood, Adv. for Intervener.
Mr. Akshay Makhija, Standing Counsel with Mr. Vikas Bhadauria and
Ms. Mahima Behl, Advs. for UOI.
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Yadav, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv for
SDMC in W.P.(C) No.3591/2014.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
1. W.P.(C) No.5975/2013 was filed, (i) for declaration that the
policy/practice of construing the basements of residential properties at par
with the other floors for the purpose of evaluating the applicable stamp duty,
under the (a) Indian Stamp Act, 1899; (b) Delhi Stamp (Prevention of Under
Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 2007; and, (c) the Notification dated 4th
December, 2012, is violative of Articles 14 & 19 of the Constitution of
India; (ii) for a direction to the respondent Government of National Capital
2015:DHC:10480-DB
W.P.(C) No.5975/2013, 3591/2014 & 10328/2015 Page 3 of 12
Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to prescribe for equitable stamp duty charges
applicable in case of sale/purchase of basements in residential properties
which are otherwise purely meant for parking or storage purposes; and, (iii)
for a direction to the respondent GNCTD to modify the existing method for
calculating the applicable stamp duty in case of sale of a floor of a
residential property by taking into consideration the maximum permissible
plinth area instead of the existing plinth area.
2. The petition was entertained and notice thereof issued.
3. W.P.(C) No.3591/2014 was filed in public interest for (i) declaration
that a) the Delhi Stamp (Prevention of Under-Valuation of Instruments)
Rules, 2007; b) the Circle Rate Notifications being Notification bb)
No.7.2(12)/Fin.(E.I)/Part File/Vol.1 (ii)/3548 dated 18th July, 2007; bbb)
No.F.1 (281)/Regn.Br./HQ/Div.Com./09/45 dated 4th February, 2011; and,
bbbb) No. F.1 (152)/Regn.Br./Div.Com./HQ/2011/780 dated 4th December,
2012 are beyond the scope of the Stamp Act as applicable to Delhi; (ii) for
declaration of the three Circle Rate Notifications aforesaid as discriminatory,
arbitrary, unreasonable and having been framed without proper application
of mind; (iii) for declaration that the e