SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKRAM BEHL – Appellant
Versus
SUDHIR BEHL AND ORS. – Respondent


CS(OS) 1306/2011

Page 1 of 3

23

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(OS) 1306/2011

Decided on : 10.04.2015

IN THE MATTER OF:

VIKRAM BEHL

..... Plaintiff

Through : Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate with

plaintiff in person

versus

SUDHIR BEHL AND ORS.

..... Defendants

Through : Mr. Aditya Dewan, Advocate for D-1

Ms. Monica Chugh Manchanda, Advocate for D-2

Mr.Mayank Wadhwa, Advocate for D-3

Mr.Arush Khanna, Advocate for D-4

CORAM

HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral)

1. This order is in continuation of the order dated 26.2.2015.

2. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit praying inter alia for

partitioning the movable assets of late Mrs. Shakuntala Behl, mother of

the parties.

3. On the last date of hearing, a comprehensive order was passed in

respect of the movable assets of the deceased, while leaving aside the

amounts lying in two bank accounts held by late Mrs. Shakuntala Behl in

the State Bank of India, Defence Colony Branch. As none of the parties

was aware of the exact amounts lying deposited in the said accounts,

2015:DHC:3290

CS(OS) 1306/2011

Page 2 of 3

notice wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top