SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MOHAN NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
FEDERAL MOGUL GOETZE INDIA LTD – Respondent


$~8

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(OS) 504/2011

MOHAN NARAYANAN

..... Plaintiff

Through:

Ms. Deepika V. Marvaha, Ms.

Worthing Kasar & Mr. Vaibhav

Asthana, Advs.

versus

FEDERAL MOGUL GOETZE INDIA LTD

..... Defendant

Through:

Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Raj S. Mittal & Mr. Ankur

Manchanda, Advs.

%

Date of Decision: 29th April, 2015

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN, J: (Oral)

IA No. 579/2015

Learned counsel for the applicant-defendant states that in view of the

reply affidavit and the objections filed by the plaintiff he wishes to withdraw

the present application.

Consequently, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.

IA No. 23076/2014

1.

Present application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking a direction to

the defendant to abide by the order dated 24th September, 2014 and to release

both the benefit defined and contribution defined superannuation benefits.

2015:DHC:3874

2.

It is pertinent to mention that on 24th September, 2014, the predecessor

of this Court had directed release of undisputed pension in favour of the

pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top