Crl.M.C.No.2586/2014

Page 1

$~21

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: July 16, 2015

+

CRL.M.C.2586/2014 & CRL.M.A.8699/2014

SMT MOHINI SHARMA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. L.S.Solanki, Advocate

versus

STATE & ANR.

.... Respondents

Through:

Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public

Prosecutor for respondent-State

Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Advocate for

Respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

JUDGMENT

% (ORAL)

In petitioner’s complaint for defamation against respondent No.2,

who happens to be an Assistant Sub Inspector of Delhi Police, he was

summoned as an accused vide order 29^th September, 2012. The

summoning order of 29^th September, 2012 was assailed by respondent-

accused by way of a criminal revision petition, which stands allowed vide

impugned order of 23^rd April, 2014.

The challenge to the impugned order by learned counsel for

petitioner-complainant is on the ground that a clear cut case of

2015:DHC:5668

Crl.M.C.No.2586/2014

Page 2

defamation is made out and so no sanction is required for prosecution of