SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
KULBHUSHAN DANIA – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR DANIA & ANR. – Respondent


RFA (OS) No.87/2015 Page 1 of 8

$~15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

RFA(OS) 87/2015

KULBHUSHAN DANIA

..... Appellant

Represented by:

Mr.Sumit Kumar Khatri, Advocate

versus

ASHOK KUMAR DANIA & ANR

..... Respondents

Represented by:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)

CM No.19097/2015

For the reasons stated in the application delay of 8 days in filing the

appeal is condoned.

RFA (OS) No.87/2015

1.

The appeal is listed for preliminary hearing today and we have drawn

attention of learned counsel for the appellant to the provision of Order 41

Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, informing learned counsel

that as per practice directions issued by this Court the record of CS (OS)

No.1117/2008 has been sent by the Registry to this Court along with the

appeal. We have asked learned counsel whether a date be fixed for hearing

2015:DHC:7516-DB

RFA (OS) No.87/2015 Page 2 of 8

the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top