DELHI HIGH COURT
KULBHUSHAN DANIA – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR DANIA & ANR. – Respondent
RFA (OS) No.87/2015 Page 1 of 8
$~15
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
RFA(OS) 87/2015
KULBHUSHAN DANIA
..... Appellant
Represented by:
Mr.Sumit Kumar Khatri, Advocate
versus
ASHOK KUMAR DANIA & ANR
..... Respondents
Represented by:
None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)
CM No.19097/2015
For the reasons stated in the application delay of 8 days in filing the
appeal is condoned.
RFA (OS) No.87/2015
1.
The appeal is listed for preliminary hearing today and we have drawn
attention of learned counsel for the appellant to the provision of Order 41
Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, informing learned counsel
that as per practice directions issued by this Court the record of CS (OS)
No.1117/2008 has been sent by the Registry to this Court along with the
appeal. We have asked learned counsel whether a date be fixed for hearing
2015:DHC:7516-DB
RFA (OS) No.87/2015 Page 2 of 8
the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.