SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAVI SAXENA AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY GENERAL, LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT AND ANR. – Respondent


$~13

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: November 04, 2015

+

W.P.(C) 10364/2015 & CM APPLNs. 25940-41/2015

RAVI SAXENA AND ORS.

..... Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Sunil Kumar Bharti and Ms.

Kumkum Bharti, Advocates

versus

THE SECRETARY GENERAL, LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT

AND ANR

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Pramod Gupta, Ms. Deepika

Singh and Ms. Sristi Pandey,

Advocates for respondent-Lok Sabha

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

JUDGMENT

% (ORAL)

For appointment on the post of ‘Sanitary Assistant, Grade-III’ (now

‘House Keeper, Grade-III’), a waitlist was drawn in the year 2008.

Petitioners vide Representations (Annexures P-15 to P-18) made between

July, 2015 to September, 2015, had sought appointment to the post of House

Keeper, Grade-III by submitting that it has been learnt through replies got

under the Right to Information Act, 2005 that the life of a waitlist panel is

not restricted and a decision was taken way back in the year 2012 by the

Competent Authority to appoint all the thirty one waitlisted candidates

without restricting to a particular time frame.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top