CS (COMM) No. 223 of 2016

Page 1 of 13

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

32.

+

CS (COMM) 223/2016

TATA SKY LTD.

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with

Mr.

Rishi

Agrawala,

Ms.

Niyati

Kohli,

Mr.Aavishkar Singhvi and Ms. Nadia Rafiq,

Advocates.

versus

YOUTUBE LLC & ORS.

..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Neel Mason, Mr. Ankit Relan and

Ms.Karnika Bansal, Advocates for Defendant

No.1.

Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Advocate for Defendant No.2.

CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

O R D E R

%

10.08.2016

IA No. 48/2016 (seeking deletion of Defendant No. 2 from array of

parties)

1. This is an application by Defendant No. 2 Google India Pvt. Ltd. („GIPL‟)

seeking its deletion from the array of parties. The only reason why GIPL

appears to have been made a party in the suit is that Defendant No. 1

YouTube LLC itself does not have an office in India.

2. Considering that Defendant No. 1 has participated in these proceedings,

and is not disputing the jurisdiction of this Court, and with Defendant No. 1

2016:DHC:5694

CS (COMM)