SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
BENARA BEARINGS & PISTONS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS INDIA PVT. LTD. – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 26.8.2016

+

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 153/2016 & CRL.M.A. Nos.9221/2016,

10230/2016 & lA No.6008/2016

BENARA BEARINGS & PISTONS LTD.

.....Petitioner

versus

MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS INDIA

PVT. LTD.

.....Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner

:Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr

Kartik Nayar, Mr Rishab Kumar, Mr Sourabh

Seth, Mr Shivanshu Pandya, Mohammad Umar

Iqbal Khan, Mr Prakhar Deep, and Ms Sonali

Mehta.

For the Respondent

: Mr Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr

Sudhir Sharma, Mr Sanjeev Sharma, Mr

Abhishek Swaroop, Mr Anirudh Gandhi &

Ms Abhilasha Vij.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

JUDGMENT

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

Introduction

1.

The Petitioner, Benara Bearings & Pistons Ltd. (hereafter 'Benara'),

is an Indian Company and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of

automotive parts including Pistons, Piston Pins, Piston Rings, Engine

Bearings and Bushes, Cylinder Liners and Sleeves, Air Cooled Blocks. The

2016:DHC:6019

Respondent, Mahle Engine Components India Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter 'Mahle')

is an Indian Company

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top