SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CHIRANJI LAL & ANR – Respondent


*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: 09.02.2017

% Decided on: 17.03.2017

+

CS(COMM) 304/2016

VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff

Through: Mr. Ratan Kumar Singh,

Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr Nishank

Tyagi and Mr Abhishek Iyer,

Advocates

versus

CHIRANJI LAL & ANR

..... Defendants

Through: Mr Sunil Dalal and Mr Ashish

Sharma, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

JUDGMENT

IA No.23676/2015 (moved by defendants under Order XXXVII Rule 3

(7) CPC r/w S.151 CPC)

1.

The present application of the defendants under Order XXXVII Rule

3 (7) of Civil Procedure Code (CPC) relates to grant of leave to defend the

present suit, which has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVII CPC

for recovery of a sum of `1,03,54,000/- along with interest at the rate of

18% per annum with effect from 02.11.2013 till actual payment. It is

submitted by the plaintiff that they are dealing in the business of real estate

and were interested in purchasing land in revenue estate of Village Surhera,

2017:DHC:1590

Tehsil Najafgarh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top