SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHAMPAI MUNDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


BAIL APPLN.294/2019

$~18

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 08.03.2019

+

BAIL APPLN. 294/2019

CHAMPAI MUNDA

..... Petitioner

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner:

Mr. Abhijeet Bhagat, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with

SI Ajay Kumar.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks Regular bail in FIR No.712/2016 under

Sections 376/506 IPC, Police Station Rajouri.

2.

Allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix were brought to

Delhi by her sister-in-law and left with the petitioner, who was to find

employment for her. It is alleged that petitioner had sent the

prosecutrix to a particular house but she did not like the work there

and she complained to the petitioner and thereafter she was sent to

another house where also she was not happy with her job and when

she complained to the petitioner, he is alleged to have taken her back

2019:DHC:1456

BAIL APPLN.294/2019

and on the way back had taken her to a secluded place and made

physical relationship wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top