CRL.A. 230/2016

Page 1 of 9

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.A. 230/2016

AMAR KUMAR PANDEY

..... Appellant

Represented by:

Mr. Gautam Khazanchi with

Mr. Udit Arora, Advocates

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Represented by:

Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the

State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1.

Amar Kumar Pandey challenges the impugned judgment dated 27^th

August, 2015 convicting him for the offences punishable under Section

376/307 IPC and the order on sentence dated 11^th September, 2015 directing

him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to

pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo

simple imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence punishable

under Section 376 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of eight

years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to

undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence

punishable under Section 307 IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the testimony of the

prosecutrix (PW-13) by itself shows that the offence under