SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ANR – Respondent
W.P.(CRL)-411/2020



W.P.(Crl.) 411/2020 1

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: February 28, 2020

+

W.P.(CRL) 411/2020 & Crl.M.A. 3075/2020

MANOJ

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr.Rajesh Singh & Ms.Barkha

Khattar, Advocates with petitioner

in person

Versus

STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu,

Additional Standing Counsel with

Mr.Shivom Sohran &Mr.Hitesh

Vali, Advocates for respondent

No.1/State with ASI R.K.Sharma

Mr. Sahil Aggarwal, Advocate

with respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

JUDGMENT

BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)

Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 175/2018, registered at

police station Hauz Khas, New Delhi for the offences under Section 408

IPC is sought on the basis of Settlement of 23rd December, 2019 reached

between the parties.

Notice.

2020:DHC:1452

W.P.(Crl.) 411/2020 2

Mr. R.S.Kundu, Additional Standing Counsel, accepts notice for

respondent No.1/State and Mr. Sahil Aggarwal, Advocate, accepts notice

for respondent No.2.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent-State submits

that respondent No.2 is represented through its Director, who is present in

the Court and he has been identified to be so, by Investigating Officer of

this case.

Mr. Bharat Sharma, Director of respondent No.2, present in the

Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably

resolved in terms of Settlement of 23rd December, 2019 and he affirms

the contents of his Affidavit of 4th February, 2020 supporting this petition

and submits that now no dispute with petitioner survives and so, the

proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end.

Upon hearing and on perusal of the FIR of this Case, I find that

continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an

exercise in futility as the misunderstanding, which led to registration of

the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 175/2018, under

Section 408 IPC, registered at police station Hauz Khas, New Delhi and

the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua petitioner.

This petition and application stand disposed of accordingly.

(BRIJESH SETHI)

JUDGE

FEBRUARY 28, 2020

r

2020:DHC:1452

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top