HIGH COURT OF DELHI
UPENDRA RAI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(CRL)-1923/2020
W. P. (CRL.) 1923 of 2020
Page 1 of 35
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment delivered on 13.05.2021
+
W. P. (CRL.) 1923/2020
UPENDRA RAI
..... Petitioner
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
& ANR.
..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner :
Mr Arjun Dewan, Mr Arjun Mukherjee and
Mr Shahryar Khan, Advocates.
For the Respondents:
Mr Nikhil Goel, SPP for CBI.
Mr SV Raju, ASG and Mr Amit Mahajan,
CGSC with Ms Sarica Raju, Mr A.
Venkatesh, Mr Guntur Pramod Kumar and
Mr Kritagya Kumar Kait, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
JUDGMENT
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
1.
The Petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order
dated 05.10.2020 (hereinafter ‗the impugned order‘) passed by the
Special Judge (PC Act), Rouse Avenue District Courts in CC No.
42/2019. By the impugned order, the learned Special Judge has
directed transfer of the trial of CC No. 42/2019 arising out of RC No.
2021:DHC:1589
W. P. (CRL.) 1923 of 2020
Page 2 of 35
217/2018/A/0004/CBI, to the Special Court (PMLA) at the Patiala
House Courts Complex.
2.
The Petitioner contends that since the Special Court (PMLA) is
not empowered to try cases for offences under the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter the ‗PC Act‘), the impugned order
transferring the case to such a court, which does not have the
jurisdiction to decide it, is patently erroneous and is liable to be set
aside.
3.
The controversy in the present case arises in the following
factual context.
4.
Respondent No. 1 (hereafter ‗CBI‘) registered two FIRs against
the Petitioner herein. The first bearing RC No. 217/2018/A/0003 dated
01.05.2018 under Sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
(hereafter ‗IPC‘) and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the
PC Act. The second bearing RC No. 217/2018/A/0004 dated
05.05.2018 registered under Sections 348/120 of the IPC and Section
8 of the PC Act. On the basis of these FIRs, Respondent No. 2
(hereinafter the ‗ED‘) registered a common Enforcement Case
Information Report bearing no. 03/HIU/2018 dated 09.05.2018.
5.
On 31.07.2018, CBI filed the Final Report under Section 173 of
the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereafter ‗Cr.PC‘), in respect of
RC No. 217/2018/A/0003. Subsequently, proceedings under Sections
13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the PC Act against the Petitioner were dropped
for want of sanction for prosecution by the Competent Authority. The
2021:DHC:1589
W. P. (CRL.) 1923 of 2020
Page 3 of 35
case was, thereafter, transferred to the learned Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate (CMM), Rouse Avenue Courts as the offences punishable
under the PC Act were dropped. Thereafter, the ED filed a Prosecution
Complaint dated 06.08.2018 under Section 45 of the Prevention of
Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter the ‗PMLA‘) before the
Special Court (PMLA), Patiala House Courts. The ED also filed a
Supplementary Complaint dated 26.10.2018. The learned Special
Court (PMLA) has taken cognizance of the said complaints.
6.
On 04.02.2019, the ED filed an application under Section
44(1)(c) of the PMLA before the CMM, Rouse Avenue Courts
seeking a transfer of the proceedings emanating out of FIR bearing RC
No. 217/2018/A/0003 dated 01.05.2018, from the said court to the
court of the ASJ/Special Court, PMLA. The said application was
allowed by an order dated 16.08.2019. The Petitioner challenged the
said order by way of a Revision Petition before the Special Judge, PC
Act, Rouse Avenue Courts. The said petition was dismissed by an
order dated 01.02.2020.
7.
CBI completed the investigation in FIR bearing RC No.
217/2018/A/0004 dated 05.05.2018 under Sections 348/120 of the IPC
and Section 8 of the PC Act (hereafter ‗FIR in question‘) and filed a
chargesheet on 06.08.2018. Thereafter, CBI filed a supplementary
chargesheet on 27.07.2020.
8.
On 14.09.2020,