HIGH COURT OF DELHI
KUBER ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD – Respondent
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-158/2021
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 158/2021 Page 1 of 14
$~8
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 158/2021
KUBER ENTERPRISES
..... Petitioner
Through Mr Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate.
versus
DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS INDIA
PVT LTD
..... Respondent
Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
[Hearing held through videoconferencing]
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL)
IA Nos. 6495/2021, IA 6496/2021
1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 158/2021
2.
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9(1)
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the „A&C
Act‟), inter alia, praying as under:-
“i)
Direct the Respondent not to invoke
and/or encash the Performance Bank
2021:DHC:1645
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 158/2021 Page 2 of 14
Guarantees No. 003GT02180720033 of
Rs. 1,18,75,000/- dated 13.03.2018. till
further orders;
ii)
Direct the Respondent not to encash the
HDFC bank cheque bearing No. 000209
amounting to Rs. 1,18,75,000/- till
further orders;
iii)
Restrain the Respondent from taking
any coercive steps against the Petitioner
in relation to the Contract dated
27.12.2017.”
3.
Mr Nath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has,
essentially, stressed on two reliefs. First, that this Court should restrain
the invocation of the bank guarantee in question (Performance Bank
Guarantee No. 003GT02180720033 of ₹1,18,75,000 –hereinafter „the
Bank Guarantee‟); and second, that the respondent be directed not to
encash the cheque furnished by the petitioner (Cheque bearing No.
000209 amounting to ₹1,18,75,000/-) till further orders.
4.
On 27.12.2017, the parties had entered into an Agreement
(Contract No: DPSI-HO-Jawa-15 –hereafter „the Agreement‟)
whereby the respondent sub-contracted CHS Civil Works of
Jawaharpur Super Thermal Power Station (2 x 660 MW Project) to the
petitioner. In terms of Clause 9.1 of the Agreement, the petitioner
furnished the Bank Guarantee as a Performance Guarantee. The
petitioner claims that it also issued a cheque for an equivalent value.
5.
Clause 9.1 of the Agreement is relevant and set out below:-
2021:DHC:1645
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 158/2021 Page 3 of 14
“9.1 Performance Bond
a)The Subcontractor shall submit to the Contractor
as a guarantee of the faithful performance of the
obligations under this Subcontract and a guarantee
of the quality of Works and materials provided by
the Subcontractor, an unconditional Performance
Bond acceptance to the Contractor In the following
manner
Performance Bank Guarantee equivalent to
Two point Five percent (2.5%) of Contract
Value.
In leu of Performance Bank Guarantee
equivalent to Two point Five percent (2.5%)
of Contract Value, Signed Cheque without
date equivalent to Two point Five percent
(2.5%) of Contract Value and Five Percent
payment hold from progressive payment.
Contractor shall return the cheque and hold
amount
once
Subcontractor
submits
Performance Bank Guarantee equivalent to
Two point Five percent (2.5%) of Contract
Value.
The Performance Bond shall expire after expiry
date of Warranty Period as defined in Clause 12
[WARRANTY] in this Sub-contract. Such guarantee
shall be binding notwithstanding any variations,
alterations or extensions of time that may be given
or be agreed upon. No interest shall be paid for this
bond.
b)The Performance Bond shall be provided by a first
class bank of the Country at Contractor‟s
2021:DHC:1645
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 158/2021