HIGH COURT OF DELHI
DR VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
DY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent
W.P.(CRL)-1093/2021
W.P.(CRL) 1093/2021 Page 1 of 10
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(CRL) 1093/2021
Date of decision: 3rd AUGUST, 2021
IN THE MATTER OF:
DR VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ANR.
..... Petitioners
Through
Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, Advocate
versus
DY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING
& ANR.
..... Respondents
Through
Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Mr. Tanuj
Bhadana, Advocate
Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for
respondent No.2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
1.
This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has
been filed with the following prayers:
2021:DHC:2302
W.P.(CRL) 1093/2021 Page 2 of 10
2.
Notice was issued on 04.06.2021. Status Report has been filed. As per
the Status Report, a number of complaints were received against one Sanjay
Bhati and others of M/s Garvit Innovative Promoters Limited, having its
registered office at Plot No.1, Chiti, Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar,
Uttar Pradesh, regarding cheating of approximately Rs.42 thousand crores.
The Status Report reveals that the accused induced gullible victims to invest
in a bike and receive monthly pay back, including principle and rental
income on that bike for one year under the scheme. It is stated that being
lured by the said scheme a number of persons invested money. It is stated
that the accused absconded with the money and, on the basis of the
allegation and inquiry conducted, FIR No.123/2019 dated 06.07.2019, was
registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing for offences under
Sections 420/406/120B IPC. Investigation was carried out. During
investigation it was found that M/sGarvit Innovative Promoters Limited,
was not registered as a NBFC with the RBI and hence it was not authorized
to initiate any collective investment scheme. Total 1544 complaints have
been received from multiple victims till the filing of the Status Report. The
role of the petitioner has been stated in the Status Report and the same reads
as under:
2021:DHC:2302
W.P.(CRL) 1093/2021 Page 3 of 10
3.
Material on record indicates that the proceedings under the Prevention
of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'The PMLA')
have been initiated against the petitioner. An application under Section 17(4)
of the PMLA was made by the petitioner on 23.03.2021 for retention of the
seized records and properties. Show cause notices have been issued to the
2021:DHC:2302
W.P.(CRL) 1093/2021 Page 4 of 10
petitioner. The material on record indicates that proceedings under Section 5
of the PMLA have been initiated against the accused persons, including the
petitioner herein, attaching various movable and immovable properties.
Show cause notices have also been issued against the accused persons
including the petitioner herein, under Section 5(5) of the PMLA stating as to
why the properties attached on 20.07.2020 should not be confirmed. The
petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) 3565/2021 with the
following prayers:
W.P.(C) 3565/2021 is pending.
4.
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that
the Economic Offence Wing (hereinafter referred to as "the EOW") cannot
continue the investigation on the ground that parallel investigation is being
undertaken by the respondent No.2 under the PMLA.
5.
Heard Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.
Avi Singh, learned ASC for the State and Mr. Amit Mahajan, learned CGSC
appearing for the respondent No.2 and perused the mat