SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DR. SITANSHI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
VANDANA SHARMA & ORS. – Respondent


CM(M) 626/2021

Page 1 of 7

$~11

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 20th September, 2021.

+

CM(M) 626/2021

DR. SITANSHI SHARMA

..... Petitioner

Through

Mr. Arvind Nayar, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi and Mr.

Akshay Joshi, Advocates

versus

VANDANA SHARMA & ORS.

..... Respondents

Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)

CM No.32398/2021 (for exemption)

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

CM(M) 626/2021 and CM No.32397/2021 (for interim directions)

3.

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India

impugns the order dated 21st August, 2021 passed by the Civil Judge-08

(Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No.1369/2020, whereby the

application filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant No.1 (hereinafter for

convenience referred to as the petitioner) under Section 151 of the Code of

Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking directions to Bharti Airtel Limited to

2021:DHC:2940

CM(M) 626/2021

Page 2 of 7

preserve and prod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top