SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M/S GOLDEN TOBACCO LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/S GOLDEN TOBIE PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Page 1 of 33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 24.09.2021

+

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 182/2021

M/S GOLDEN TOBACCO LIMITED

..... Petitioner

versus

M/S GOLDEN TOBIE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner

: Mr Sumeet Verma and Mr Mahinder

Pratap Singh, Advocates.

For the Respondent

: Mrs Anjali J. Manish, Mr Priyadarshi

Manish and Ms Kinjal Shrivastava,

Advocates.

CORAM

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

JUDGMENT

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

1.

M/s Golden Tobacco Limited (hereafter GTL) has filed the

present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996 (hereafter the „A&C Act‟), inter alia, praying that the

respondent M/s Golden Trobe Private Limited (hereafter „GTPL‟) be

restrained from manufacturing, selling and supplying to the market,

cigarettes under the exclusive brands owned by GTL, that is, Panama,

Golden Gold Flake, Golden Classic, Taj Chhap and Chancellor

(hereafter referred to as „the Exclusive Brands‟).

2021:DHC:3011

Page 2 of 33

2.

GTL claims that it is the owner of the Ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top