SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SADRE ALAM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. – Respondent


W.P.(C) 8654/2021

Page 1 of 77

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 8654/2021 & CM APPL. 26788/2021 (stay)

%

SADRE ALAM

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. B.S. Bagga, Advocate

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General

of India with Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor

General, Mr. Amit Mahajan, Central Government

Standing Counsel, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Vinay

Yadav, Mr. Akshay Gadeock and Mr. Sahaj Garg,

Advocates for Respondent No.1.

Mr.

Mukul

Rohatgi,

Senior

Advocate,

Mr. Maninder Singh, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Diksha Rai, Ms. Devanshi Singh, Mr. Ankit

Agarwal, Mr. Prabhas Bajaj and Ms. Palak

Mahajan, Advocates for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Neha Rathi and

Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Advocates for Intervener.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

JUDGMENT

:

Per D. N. PATEL, Chief Justice

1.

Present public interest litigation has been preferred seeking the

following reliefs:-

a.

2021:DHC:3261-DB

W.P.(C) 8654/2021

Page 2 of 77

b.

d.

of the instant case.

2.

We have heard learned counsel appearing o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top