SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR MODANWAL – Appellant
Versus
M/S. A. R. SPARES PVT LTD – Respondent


$~9

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

FAO (COMM) 193/2021 & CM APPL. 43309-43310/2021

RAJESH KUMAR MODANWAL

..... Appellant

Through

Mr.Rishabh Sahu, Adv.

versus

M/S A.R. SPARES PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent

Through

Mr.Ashok Mittal with Mr.Rishabh

Srivastava, Mr.Sanjay Aggarwal and

Ms.Radhika Arora, Advocates.

%

Date of Decision: 13th December, 2021

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN, J

1.

Present appeal has been filed challenging the impugned order dated

20

:

th

2.

Learned counsel for the Appellant-Defendant states that the

Appellant-Defendant is engaged in the business of sale and supply of

motorcycle auto spare parts included in class 12 under the Trade mark no

3718530 which was granted to the Appellant-Defendant on 3

February, 2020 passed by learned District Judge (Commercial Court)

West District, Tis Hazari Court. Appellant-Defendant also seeks a direction

to stay further proceedings in CS (COMM) No. 407/2019 till the disposal of

the present appeal.

rd January,

2018.

2021:DHC:4162-DB

3.

He states that the Respondent-Pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top